That’s right! If you at all found yourself, ahem, guilty, of gossiping about a murder case at Sunday brunch or tuning into one of Spotify’s dozens of true-crime podcasts, then George Glass’s Dial M for Mushrooms has something to serve you up.
Peaking behind the curtain of the infamous Patterson mushroom murder trial that swept headlines last year, the comedy musical delivers a delightfully tongue-in-cheek snicker at the true-crime obsessed media landscape.
What the Adelaide art-rock band lacks in high-budget polish, they make up for with energetic musicality, outlandish physical gags, a fever dream cast of characters and a whole lot of mentos. The recipe of this beef wellington revolves around the Glass boys’ unique approach to the source material. What could be a cut and dry satire of Erin Patterson’s misdeeds instead lends itself to a far more interesting commentary on the lounge-room judges of the world.
The rise of true-crime as a media monolith has seen the names of OJ Simpson, Ted Bundy and Jeffery Dahamar being firmly cemented in the cultural zeitgeist, so when the ‘mushroom murders’ hit the news last year it’s no wonder that it exploded into the Australian consciousness.
But the courtroom obsession begs the question ‘Is any of this very ethical?’. In an intimate, lightly B.O scented room in the ‘Emerging Artist Share House’, the Glass boys say no – but it might be a bit bloody stupid.
Searing the beef – Giving Silly Substance
The stage is delightfully rough around the edges boasting cardboard props and a precarious fold-out table housing a mountain of mentos. The musical kicks into gear with a flurry of noise and Blue Light Disco lighting flooding giddy colour over the set as two overly enthused, under-empathetic hack journos call for ‘a little sensation!’.
The tone of the performance is immediately set – high camp and low brow – but despite the raunchy lyrics and punchy guitar licks, there is a signalling to the audience that the writers are also acutely aware of the ethical considerations that come with this subject. To our relief the performance avoids recreating or even depicting the murders. Instead we follow a neurotic bus driver, a nonsensical South African priest and an uppity pregnant woman as they struggle to the end of their jury duty fueled by coffee and mentos – a stable courtroom diet.
Set in an imagined deliberation room, the creation of our three jurors manages to decentralise the victims and crime to instead poke well meaning fun at the audience.
The jokes, erring on the side of ‘potty humour’ and absurd outrage, steer us far enough away from the case that it almost becomes fiction. The comedic stylings manage to decentralise the crime. It’s telling that we never hear the killer’s name, or where it took place – instead the musical is more interested in the obsession of a flawed public and the delicious taste of mentos.
The case becomes something made up for us to scribble all over. The musical, less of an adaptation and more cheap paper table cloth ripe for crayons.